Saturday, December 7, 2013

Testing for Intelligence?


This week we have been challenged to answer the question: What is the most effective way to measure children’s abilities? I believe the answer to this question does not rest in a single method, but in a combination of methods in order to best measure each child’s knowledge and abilities. Most school systems in the United States rely on the results of standardized tests to measure student achievement. But how many children (and even adults) excel with the standard pencil and paper exam? Or even newer, computer based exams with question after question being asked? Tests like these should only be one component of measuring student achievement. They should not be the end-all, be-all measure we rely on. As we know, people learn in a variety of ways. Some people are visual learners, others auditory, others kinesthetic, and so on. People excel in different subjects. So why are we only testing children one way? It is my opinion that children’s knowledge and abilities need to be tested through teacher observations, student demonstrations or presentations and samples of completed work collected over a period of time, in addition to the occasional standardized test.  This will create a more comprehensive view of the student’s abilities, and highlight areas in need of improvement for reteaching.
                Children’s knowledge should not be measured by one test on one day in their life. Many factors influence children’s achievement on such standardized tests. If the child is hungry, tired, ill, or emotionally distraught due to a personal event, the test results will be skewed and will not be a true representation of what the child knows or can do.
                As part of my research this week, I sought to find out more about how children are assessed in another part of the world. For this assignment, I chose Argentina, a country dear to my heart because my husband was born there, and attended school there until age thirteen. I researched how children are educated there today, compared to what he remembers.  According to my research, children in Argentina are assessed by teacher made tests and observations. Standardized testing for reading comprehension is done in grades three, six, nine and twelve. Other than that, standardized tests are not used except for admission to universities.  When talking to my husband, he remembers attending school in the morning, wearing a uniform, and learning subjects similar to those taught here in the US. He recalls taking written tests, both open and closed book, making posters, and doing presentations in front of the class. Combining these methods presents a much larger picture of the student’s knowledge than each method alone.
 I am concerned with the weight the results of standardized testing is having on our children today. Children are pressured to perform well on these tests, and are often “taught to the test”, at the expense of learning other things. I am concerned that we as a society are putting too much stress on these tests and not looking at children’s achievements as a whole. Children should be assessed as a whole person, not just one test on one day. It is my hope that more educators will stand up and say “This is wrong. We should assess children’s achievement using a variety of methods, not just one.”


3 comments:

  1. Celeste
    First of good job. I always like to learn about different countries and I did not about Argentina's educational system. I find it very interesting that testing is not used in Argentina except for collages and university's. It reminds me of when I was little growing up in Texas. We did not have the assessment tests like children have now. And just like in Argentina, the only tests I took were teacher made tests,

    ReplyDelete
  2. Celeste,
    I agree with you about testing the child as a whole. I didn't know my learning style until I was in college. I feel that if I had known sooner, it would have made my learning much more enjoyable which would have helped me learn even more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Celeste, I agree with you that children's knowledge should not be measured by one test. I can think over and over how many times I have bombed a test for various reasons when I really did know the information but was just having a bad day. In our classrooms when we test children some days they know their colors and can spell their names and others they cannot. With constant testing, we do get the true picture of a child's abilities. Good Post, Diana

    ReplyDelete